Hi Martin,
> On 11/26/18 10:52 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>>> I have now committed this patch as r266418.
>>
>> this patch has created a bunch of XPASSes everywhere:
>>
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>> warnings, line 119)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>> warnings, line 120)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>> warnings, line 116)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>> warnings, line 117)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>> warnings, line 84)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>> line 110)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>> line 142)
>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>> line 143)
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I like those much better than FAILs :)
fully agreed ;-) However, at some point too many XFAILs make the real
problems harder to spot in mail-report.log...
> I've removed the passing xfails from the tests via r266522 and
> replaced the remaining with references to the new bugs I created
> for the outstanding gaps: 88226 and 88211.
Excellent, thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
