On 11/9/18 7:21 AM, Paul Koning wrote: > Ping. > > I'd like to commit this. The discussion seems to have ended up with the > conclusion that this is a reasonable approach. > > paul > > >> On Nov 1, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Paul Koning <paulkon...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> A number of test cases contain declarations like: >> void *memcpy(); >> which currently are silently accepted on most platforms but not on all; >> pdp11 (and possibly some others) generate a "conflicting types for built-in >> function" warning. >> >> It was suggested to prune those messages because the test cases where these >> occur are not looking for the message but are testing some other issue, so >> the message is not relevant. The attached patch adds dg-prune-output >> directives to do so. >> >> Ok for trunk? >> >> paul >> >> ChangeLog: >> >> 2018-11-01 Paul Koning <n...@arrl.net> >> >> * gcc.dg/Walloca-16.c: Ignore conflicting types for built-in >> warnings. >> * gcc.dg/Wrestrict-4.c: Ditto. >> * gcc.dg/Wrestrict-5.c: Ditto. >> * gcc.dg/pr83463.c: Ditto. >> * gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-2.c: Ditto. >> * gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-3.c: Ditto. >> * gcc.dg/torture/pr71816.c: Ditto. OK. Thanks for being patient with the round and round on this one.
jeff
