On 11/1/18 1:13 PM, Paul Koning wrote: > A number of test cases contain declarations like: > void *memcpy(); > which currently are silently accepted on most platforms but not on all; pdp11 > (and possibly some others) generate a "conflicting types for built-in > function" warning. > > It was suggested to prune those messages because the test cases where these > occur are not looking for the message but are testing some other issue, so > the message is not relevant. The attached patch adds dg-prune-output > directives to do so. > > Ok for trunk? > > paul > > ChangeLog: > > 2018-11-01 Paul Koning <n...@arrl.net> > > * gcc.dg/Walloca-16.c: Ignore conflicting types for built-in > warnings. > * gcc.dg/Wrestrict-4.c: Ditto. > * gcc.dg/Wrestrict-5.c: Ditto. > * gcc.dg/pr83463.c: Ditto. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-2.c: Ditto. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-3.c: Ditto. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr71816.c: Ditto. ISTM it'd be better to just fix memcpy to have a correct prototype.
jeff
