On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > What the patch does is to change the return value from > 'gfc_try' (SUCCESS/FAILURE) to 'match' > (MATCH_YES/MATCH_NO/MATCH_ERROR). Of course we're not really > 'matching' anything here, but the yes/no/error range of values is > exactly what we need in this case, so I think (ab-)using the 'match' > enum makes sense.
I don't like that at all. Sooner or later that's going to confuse someone. There has to be a better solution... Ciao! Steven
