Hi!

While working on the next PR, I've noticed we only fold this on generic, not
gimple.

Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk?

2018-09-12  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/87287
        * fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc) <case EQ_EXPR>: Move signed modulo
        X % C == 0 to X % (unsigned) C == 0 optimization to ...
        * match.pd (X % C == 0): ... here.  New optimization.

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr87287.c: New test.

--- gcc/match.pd.jj     2018-08-29 13:32:54.427224535 +0200
+++ gcc/match.pd        2018-09-12 16:25:01.385733828 +0200
@@ -470,7 +470,15 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY
        && TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type)
        && wi::multiple_of_p (wi::to_wide (@1), wi::to_wide (@2),
                             TYPE_SIGN (type)))
-   { build_zero_cst (type); })))
+   { build_zero_cst (type); }))
+ /* For (X % C) == 0, if X is signed and C is power of 2, use unsigned
+    modulo and comparison, since it is simpler and equivalent.  */
+ (for cmp (eq ne)
+  (simplify
+   (cmp (mod @0 integer_pow2p@2) integer_zerop@1)
+   (if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
+    (with { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }
+     (cmp (mod (convert:utype @0) (convert:utype @2)) (convert:utype @1)))))))
 
 /* X % -C is the same as X % C.  */
 (simplify
--- gcc/fold-const.c.jj 2018-09-12 11:18:26.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/fold-const.c    2018-09-12 16:19:39.289018098 +0200
@@ -10661,28 +10661,6 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc, enum tr
            }
        }
 
-      /* If this is an NE or EQ comparison of zero against the result of a
-        signed MOD operation whose second operand is a power of 2, make
-        the MOD operation unsigned since it is simpler and equivalent.  */
-      if (integer_zerop (arg1)
-         && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
-         && (TREE_CODE (arg0) == TRUNC_MOD_EXPR
-             || TREE_CODE (arg0) == CEIL_MOD_EXPR
-             || TREE_CODE (arg0) == FLOOR_MOD_EXPR
-             || TREE_CODE (arg0) == ROUND_MOD_EXPR)
-         && integer_pow2p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)))
-       {
-         tree newtype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (arg0));
-         tree newmod = fold_build2_loc (loc, TREE_CODE (arg0), newtype,
-                                    fold_convert_loc (loc, newtype,
-                                                      TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)),
-                                    fold_convert_loc (loc, newtype,
-                                                      TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)));
-
-         return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, newmod,
-                             fold_convert_loc (loc, newtype, arg1));
-       }
-
       /* Fold ((X >> C1) & C2) == 0 and ((X >> C1) & C2) != 0 where
         C1 is a valid shift constant, and C2 is a power of two, i.e.
         a single bit.  */
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr87287.c.jj  2018-09-12 16:37:38.817307646 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr87287.c     2018-09-12 16:36:50.293103713 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/87287 */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-cddce1" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " % 16" "cddce1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " & 15" 4 "cddce1" } } */
+
+void f0 (void);
+
+int
+f1 (int x)
+{
+  return x % 16 == 0;
+}
+
+int
+f2 (int x)
+{
+  int y = x % 16;
+  return y != 0;
+}
+
+void
+f3 (int x)
+{
+  if (x % 16 != 0)
+    f0 ();
+}
+
+void
+f4 (int x)
+{
+  int y = x % 16;
+  if (y == 0)
+    f0 ();
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to