On 05/23/2018 12:17 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:04:38PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
Switch from using generic address costs to using Falkor-specific ones, which
give Falkor better results overall.
OK for trunk?
Given this is a Falkor-specific adjustment, would this be an acceptable
backport for GCC 8 as well?
OK for trunk.
It doesn't fix a regression, so it wouldn't really fit the definition of
a backport patch. That said, if it is important to you to have it in GCC 8,
it is sufficiently low-risk for non-Falkor targets that we can take it. So,
it is your call if you want to backport it or not.
Thanks,
James
Thanks. For now i've pushed it to mainline as r260675.
