On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:04:38PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote: > Switch from using generic address costs to using Falkor-specific ones, which > give Falkor better results overall. > > OK for trunk? > > Given this is a Falkor-specific adjustment, would this be an acceptable > backport for GCC 8 as well?
OK for trunk. It doesn't fix a regression, so it wouldn't really fit the definition of a backport patch. That said, if it is important to you to have it in GCC 8, it is sufficiently low-risk for non-Falkor targets that we can take it. So, it is your call if you want to backport it or not. Thanks, James > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2018-05-22 Luis Machado <luis.mach...@linaro.org> > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (qdf24xx_addrcost_table): New static > global. > (qdf24xx_tunings) <addr_costs>: Set to qdf24xx_addrcost_table.
