On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/20/2011 06:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Joseph S. Myers >> <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >>> >>> Do these operations exist for x32 as well as for -m64? If they do, then >>> lp64 isn't the right test either; if not, then it is. >>> >> X32 has native int64 and int128. >> > I presume there is no atomic support for int128 though, and thats what > 'condition check_effective_target_sync_int_128' is testing for. >
X32 uses x86-64 instruction set with 32bit pointers. It has the same atomic support as x86-64 and has atomic support for int128. -- H.J.
