By golly you are right! Je vous en remercie :-)
Paul On 2 March 2018 at 08:41, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 09:38, Paul Richard Thomas > <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Christophe, >> >> I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know. >> >> It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previously, an >> ICE would occur instead of the intended error message. >> >> I do not have access to either targets. Would you be so kind as to run >> coarray_47.f90 separately to see what happens? Note that 7-branch >> behaves correctly. >> >> Cheers > > According to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-03/ > it also happens on x86_64, I suspect that's easier for you? > > Thanks, > > Christophe > >> >> Paul >> >> On 2 March 2018 at 08:26, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 1 March 2018 at 14:28, Paul Richard Thomas >>> <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Committed as 'obvious' in revision 258098. >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >>>> >>>> PR fortran/84219 >>>> * target-memory.c (gfc_interpret_derived): Assert that BT_VOID >>>> components are caf tokens. >>>> (gfc_target_interpret_expr): Treat BT_VOID expressions as >>>> integers. >>>> >>>> 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >>>> >>>> PR fortran/84219 >>>> * gfortran.dg/coarray_47.f90: New test. >>> >>> >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> You may already be aware of that, but the new test fails at least on >>> aarch64 and arm targets: >>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_47.f90 -O (test for errors, line 12) >>> As a matter of fact, I can see no error message in gfortran.log, hence >>> dg-error fails to match. >>> >>> Christophe >> >> >> >> -- >> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" >> - Albert Einstein -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
