Hi Christophe, I was not aware. Thanks for letting me know.
It's wierd that there is no error message or an ICE. Previously, an ICE would occur instead of the intended error message. I do not have access to either targets. Would you be so kind as to run coarray_47.f90 separately to see what happens? Note that 7-branch behaves correctly. Cheers Paul On 2 March 2018 at 08:26, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 March 2018 at 14:28, Paul Richard Thomas > <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Committed as 'obvious' in revision 258098. >> >> Paul >> >> 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/84219 >> * target-memory.c (gfc_interpret_derived): Assert that BT_VOID >> components are caf tokens. >> (gfc_target_interpret_expr): Treat BT_VOID expressions as >> integers. >> >> 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/84219 >> * gfortran.dg/coarray_47.f90: New test. > > > Hi Paul, > > You may already be aware of that, but the new test fails at least on > aarch64 and arm targets: > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_47.f90 -O (test for errors, line 12) > As a matter of fact, I can see no error message in gfortran.log, hence > dg-error fails to match. > > Christophe -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
