> Hi.
>
> I'm aware in which development stage we are. However the patch is small and
> makes
> dump files readable. Hope such patch can be accepted even now?
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Martin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-01-22 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
>
> * tree-profile.c (tree_profiling): Print function header to
> aware reader which function we are working on.
> * value-prof.c (gimple_find_values_to_profile): Do not print
> not interesting value histograms.
OK. How those non-interesting value histograms arrise?
Honza
> ---
> gcc/tree-profile.c | 4 ++++
> gcc/value-prof.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-profile.c b/gcc/tree-profile.c
> index 9d919062db1..f96bd4b9704 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-profile.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-profile.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> #include "params.h"
> #include "stringpool.h"
> #include "attribs.h"
> +#include "tree-pretty-print.h"
>
> static GTY(()) tree gcov_type_node;
> static GTY(()) tree tree_interval_profiler_fn;
> @@ -671,6 +672,9 @@ tree_profiling (void)
>
> push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl));
>
> + if (dump_file)
> + dump_function_header (dump_file, cfun->decl, dump_flags);
> +
> /* Local pure-const may imply need to fixup the cfg. */
> if (execute_fixup_cfg () & TODO_cleanup_cfg)
> cleanup_tree_cfg ();
> diff --git a/gcc/value-prof.c b/gcc/value-prof.c
> index b503320f188..16cdbd64f46 100644
> --- a/gcc/value-prof.c
> +++ b/gcc/value-prof.c
> @@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ gimple_find_values_to_profile (histogram_values *values)
> default:
> gcc_unreachable ();
> }
> - if (dump_file)
> + if (dump_file && hist->hvalue.stmt != NULL)
> {
> fprintf (dump_file, "Stmt ");
> print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, hist->hvalue.stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
>
