Hi.
I'm aware in which development stage we are. However the patch is small and
makes
dump files readable. Hope such patch can be accepted even now?
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-01-22 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
* tree-profile.c (tree_profiling): Print function header to
aware reader which function we are working on.
* value-prof.c (gimple_find_values_to_profile): Do not print
not interesting value histograms.
---
gcc/tree-profile.c | 4 ++++
gcc/value-prof.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-profile.c b/gcc/tree-profile.c
index 9d919062db1..f96bd4b9704 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-profile.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-profile.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "params.h"
#include "stringpool.h"
#include "attribs.h"
+#include "tree-pretty-print.h"
static GTY(()) tree gcov_type_node;
static GTY(()) tree tree_interval_profiler_fn;
@@ -671,6 +672,9 @@ tree_profiling (void)
push_cfun (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl));
+ if (dump_file)
+ dump_function_header (dump_file, cfun->decl, dump_flags);
+
/* Local pure-const may imply need to fixup the cfg. */
if (execute_fixup_cfg () & TODO_cleanup_cfg)
cleanup_tree_cfg ();
diff --git a/gcc/value-prof.c b/gcc/value-prof.c
index b503320f188..16cdbd64f46 100644
--- a/gcc/value-prof.c
+++ b/gcc/value-prof.c
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ gimple_find_values_to_profile (histogram_values *values)
default:
gcc_unreachable ();
}
- if (dump_file)
+ if (dump_file && hist->hvalue.stmt != NULL)
{
fprintf (dump_file, "Stmt ");
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, hist->hvalue.stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
