Ping**2

Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> writes:
> Ping
>
> Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> writes:
>> This patch makes the AArch64 vec_perm_const code use the new
>> vec_perm_indices routines, instead of checking each element individually.
>> This means that they extend naturally to variable-length vectors.
>>
>> Also, aarch64_evpc_dup was the only function that generated rtl when
>> testing_p is true, and that looked accidental.  The patch adds the
>> missing check and then replaces the gen_rtx_REG/start_sequence/
>> end_sequence stuff with an assert that no rtl is generated.
>>
>> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.  Also tested by making sure that there
>> were no assembly output differences for aarch64_be-linux-gnu or
>> aarch64_be-linux-gnu.  OK to install?
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> 2017-12-09  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@linaro.org>
>>
>> gcc/
>>      * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_trn): Use d.perm.series_p
>>      instead of checking each element individually.
>>      (aarch64_evpc_uzp): Likewise.
>>      (aarch64_evpc_zip): Likewise.
>>      (aarch64_evpc_ext): Likewise.
>>      (aarch64_evpc_rev): Likewise.
>>      (aarch64_evpc_dup): Test the encoding for a single duplicated element,
>>      instead of checking each element individually.  Return true without
>>      generating rtl if
>>      (aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const): Use all_from_input_p to test
>>      whether all selected elements come from the same input, instead of
>>      checking each element individually.  Remove calls to gen_rtx_REG,
>>      start_sequence and end_sequence and instead assert that no rtl is
>>      generated.
>>
>> Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c     2017-12-09 22:48:47.535824832 +0000
>> +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c     2017-12-09 22:49:00.139270410 +0000
>> @@ -13295,7 +13295,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vec_perm (rtx target, rtx
>>  static bool
>>  aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>>  {
>> -  unsigned int i, odd, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int odd, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>>  
>> @@ -13304,21 +13304,11 @@ aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  
>>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
>> -  if (d->perm[0] == 0)
>> -    odd = 0;
>> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 1)
>> -    odd = 1;
>> -  else
>> +  odd = d->perm[0];
>> +  if ((odd != 0 && odd != 1)
>> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 2, odd, 2)
>> +      || !d->perm.series_p (1, 2, nelt + odd, 2))
>>      return false;
>> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
>> -
>> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt; i += 2)
>> -    {
>> -      if (d->perm[i] != i + odd)
>> -    return false;
>> -      if (d->perm[i + 1] != ((i + nelt + odd) & mask))
>> -    return false;
>> -    }
>>  
>>    /* Success!  */
>>    if (d->testing_p)
>> @@ -13342,7 +13332,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  static bool
>>  aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>>  {
>> -  unsigned int i, odd, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int odd;
>>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>>  
>> @@ -13351,20 +13341,10 @@ aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  
>>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
>> -  if (d->perm[0] == 0)
>> -    odd = 0;
>> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 1)
>> -    odd = 1;
>> -  else
>> +  odd = d->perm[0];
>> +  if ((odd != 0 && odd != 1)
>> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 1, odd, 2))
>>      return false;
>> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
>> -
>> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt; i++)
>> -    {
>> -      unsigned elt = (i * 2 + odd) & mask;
>> -      if (d->perm[i] != elt)
>> -    return false;
>> -    }
>>  
>>    /* Success!  */
>>    if (d->testing_p)
>> @@ -13388,7 +13368,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  static bool
>>  aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>>  {
>> -  unsigned int i, high, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int high, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>>  
>> @@ -13397,25 +13377,11 @@ aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  
>>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
>> -  high = nelt / 2;
>> -  if (d->perm[0] == high)
>> -    /* Do Nothing.  */
>> -    ;
>> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 0)
>> -    high = 0;
>> -  else
>> +  high = d->perm[0];
>> +  if ((high != 0 && high * 2 != nelt)
>> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 2, high, 1)
>> +      || !d->perm.series_p (1, 2, high + nelt, 1))
>>      return false;
>> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
>> -
>> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt / 2; i++)
>> -    {
>> -      unsigned elt = (i + high) & mask;
>> -      if (d->perm[i * 2] != elt)
>> -    return false;
>> -      elt = (elt + nelt) & mask;
>> -      if (d->perm[i * 2 + 1] != elt)
>> -    return false;
>> -    }
>>  
>>    /* Success!  */
>>    if (d->testing_p)
>> @@ -13440,23 +13406,14 @@ aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  static bool
>>  aarch64_evpc_ext (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>>  {
>> -  unsigned int i, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int nelt = d->perm.length ();
>>    rtx offset;
>>  
>>    unsigned int location = d->perm[0]; /* Always < nelt.  */
>>  
>>    /* Check if the extracted indices are increasing by one.  */
>> -  for (i = 1; i < nelt; i++)
>> -    {
>> -      unsigned int required = location + i;
>> -      if (d->one_vector_p)
>> -        {
>> -          /* We'll pass the same vector in twice, so allow indices to wrap. 
>>  */
>> -      required &= (nelt - 1);
>> -    }
>> -      if (d->perm[i] != required)
>> -        return false;
>> -    }
>> +  if (!d->perm.series_p (0, 1, location, 1))
>> +    return false;
>>  
>>    /* Success! */
>>    if (d->testing_p)
>> @@ -13488,7 +13445,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_ext (struct expand_vec_perm
>>  static bool
>>  aarch64_evpc_rev (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>>  {
>> -  unsigned int i, j, diff, size, unspec, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int i, diff, size, unspec;
>>  
>>    if (!d->one_vector_p)
>>      return false;
>> @@ -13504,18 +13461,10 @@ aarch64_evpc_rev (struct expand_vec_perm
>>    else
>>      return false;
>>  
>> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt ; i += diff + 1)
>> -    for (j = 0; j <= diff; j += 1)
>> -      {
>> -    /* This is guaranteed to be true as the value of diff
>> -       is 7, 3, 1 and we should have enough elements in the
>> -       queue to generate this.  Getting a vector mask with a
>> -       value of diff other than these values implies that
>> -       something is wrong by the time we get here.  */
>> -    gcc_assert (i + j < nelt);
>> -    if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
>> -      return false;
>> -      }
>> +  unsigned int step = diff + 1;
>> +  for (i = 0; i < step; ++i)
>> +    if (!d->perm.series_p (i, step, diff - i, step))
>> +      return false;
>>  
>>    /* Success! */
>>    if (d->testing_p)
>> @@ -13532,15 +13481,17 @@ aarch64_evpc_dup (struct expand_vec_perm
>>    rtx out = d->target;
>>    rtx in0;
>>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>> -  unsigned int i, elt, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>> +  unsigned int elt;
>>    rtx lane;
>>  
>> +  if (d->perm.encoding ().encoded_nelts () != 1)
>> +    return false;
>> +
>> +  /* Success! */
>> +  if (d->testing_p)
>> +    return true;
>> +
>>    elt = d->perm[0];
>> -  for (i = 1; i < nelt; i++)
>> -    {
>> -      if (elt != d->perm[i])
>> -    return false;
>> -    }
>>  
>>    /* The generic preparation in aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1
>>       swaps the operand order and the permute indices if it finds
>> @@ -13628,61 +13579,37 @@ aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machin
>>                                rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel)
>>  {
>>    struct expand_vec_perm_d d;
>> -  unsigned int i, which;
>>  
>> -  d.vmode = vmode;
>> -  d.target = target;
>> -  d.op0 = op0;
>> -  d.op1 = op1;
>> -  d.testing_p = !target;
>> -
>> -  /* Calculate whether all elements are in one vector.  */
>> -  unsigned int nelt = sel.length ();
>> -  for (i = which = 0; i < nelt; ++i)
>> +  /* Check whether the mask can be applied to a single vector.  */
>> +  if (op0 && rtx_equal_p (op0, op1))
>> +    d.one_vector_p = true;
>> +  else if (sel.all_from_input_p (0))
>>      {
>> -      unsigned int ei = sel[i] & (2 * nelt - 1);
>> -      which |= (ei < nelt ? 1 : 2);
>> +      d.one_vector_p = true;
>> +      op1 = op0;
>>      }
>> -
>> -  switch (which)
>> +  else if (sel.all_from_input_p (1))
>>      {
>> -    default:
>> -      gcc_unreachable ();
>> -
>> -    case 3:
>> -      d.one_vector_p = false;
>> -      if (d.testing_p || !rtx_equal_p (op0, op1))
>> -    break;
>> -
>> -      /* The elements of PERM do not suggest that only the first operand
>> -     is used, but both operands are identical.  Allow easier matching
>> -     of the permutation by folding the permutation into the single
>> -     input vector.  */
>> -      /* Fall Through.  */
>> -    case 2:
>> -      d.op0 = op1;
>> -      d.one_vector_p = true;
>> -      break;
>> -
>> -    case 1:
>> -      d.op1 = op0;
>>        d.one_vector_p = true;
>> -      break;
>> +      op0 = op1;
>>      }
>> +  else
>> +    d.one_vector_p = false;
>>  
>> -  d.perm.new_vector (sel.encoding (), d.one_vector_p ? 1 : 2, nelt);
>> +  d.perm.new_vector (sel.encoding (), d.one_vector_p ? 1 : 2,
>> +                 sel.nelts_per_input ());
>> +  d.vmode = vmode;
>> +  d.target = target;
>> +  d.op0 = op0;
>> +  d.op1 = op1;
>> +  d.testing_p = !target;
>>  
>>    if (!d.testing_p)
>>      return aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (&d);
>>  
>> -  d.target = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 1);
>> -  d.op1 = d.op0 = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 2);
>> -  if (!d.one_vector_p)
>> -    d.op1 = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 3);
>> -
>> -  start_sequence ();
>> +  rtx_insn *last = get_last_insn ();
>>    bool ret = aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (&d);
>> -  end_sequence ();
>> +  gcc_assert (last == get_last_insn ());
>>  
>>    return ret;
>>  }

Reply via email to