Ping

Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> writes:
> This patch makes the AArch64 vec_perm_const code use the new
> vec_perm_indices routines, instead of checking each element individually.
> This means that they extend naturally to variable-length vectors.
>
> Also, aarch64_evpc_dup was the only function that generated rtl when
> testing_p is true, and that looked accidental.  The patch adds the
> missing check and then replaces the gen_rtx_REG/start_sequence/
> end_sequence stuff with an assert that no rtl is generated.
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.  Also tested by making sure that there
> were no assembly output differences for aarch64_be-linux-gnu or
> aarch64_be-linux-gnu.  OK to install?
>
> Richard
>
>
> 2017-12-09  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@linaro.org>
>
> gcc/
>       * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_trn): Use d.perm.series_p
>       instead of checking each element individually.
>       (aarch64_evpc_uzp): Likewise.
>       (aarch64_evpc_zip): Likewise.
>       (aarch64_evpc_ext): Likewise.
>       (aarch64_evpc_rev): Likewise.
>       (aarch64_evpc_dup): Test the encoding for a single duplicated element,
>       instead of checking each element individually.  Return true without
>       generating rtl if
>       (aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const): Use all_from_input_p to test
>       whether all selected elements come from the same input, instead of
>       checking each element individually.  Remove calls to gen_rtx_REG,
>       start_sequence and end_sequence and instead assert that no rtl is
>       generated.
>
> Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c      2017-12-09 22:48:47.535824832 +0000
> +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c      2017-12-09 22:49:00.139270410 +0000
> @@ -13295,7 +13295,7 @@ aarch64_expand_vec_perm (rtx target, rtx
>  static bool
>  aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>  {
> -  unsigned int i, odd, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int odd, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>  
> @@ -13304,21 +13304,11 @@ aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm
>  
>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
> -  if (d->perm[0] == 0)
> -    odd = 0;
> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 1)
> -    odd = 1;
> -  else
> +  odd = d->perm[0];
> +  if ((odd != 0 && odd != 1)
> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 2, odd, 2)
> +      || !d->perm.series_p (1, 2, nelt + odd, 2))
>      return false;
> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
> -
> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt; i += 2)
> -    {
> -      if (d->perm[i] != i + odd)
> -     return false;
> -      if (d->perm[i + 1] != ((i + nelt + odd) & mask))
> -     return false;
> -    }
>  
>    /* Success!  */
>    if (d->testing_p)
> @@ -13342,7 +13332,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_trn (struct expand_vec_perm
>  static bool
>  aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>  {
> -  unsigned int i, odd, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int odd;
>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>  
> @@ -13351,20 +13341,10 @@ aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm
>  
>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
> -  if (d->perm[0] == 0)
> -    odd = 0;
> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 1)
> -    odd = 1;
> -  else
> +  odd = d->perm[0];
> +  if ((odd != 0 && odd != 1)
> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 1, odd, 2))
>      return false;
> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
> -
> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt; i++)
> -    {
> -      unsigned elt = (i * 2 + odd) & mask;
> -      if (d->perm[i] != elt)
> -     return false;
> -    }
>  
>    /* Success!  */
>    if (d->testing_p)
> @@ -13388,7 +13368,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_uzp (struct expand_vec_perm
>  static bool
>  aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>  {
> -  unsigned int i, high, mask, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int high, nelt = d->perm.length ();
>    rtx out, in0, in1, x;
>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
>  
> @@ -13397,25 +13377,11 @@ aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm
>  
>    /* Note that these are little-endian tests.
>       We correct for big-endian later.  */
> -  high = nelt / 2;
> -  if (d->perm[0] == high)
> -    /* Do Nothing.  */
> -    ;
> -  else if (d->perm[0] == 0)
> -    high = 0;
> -  else
> +  high = d->perm[0];
> +  if ((high != 0 && high * 2 != nelt)
> +      || !d->perm.series_p (0, 2, high, 1)
> +      || !d->perm.series_p (1, 2, high + nelt, 1))
>      return false;
> -  mask = (d->one_vector_p ? nelt - 1 : 2 * nelt - 1);
> -
> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt / 2; i++)
> -    {
> -      unsigned elt = (i + high) & mask;
> -      if (d->perm[i * 2] != elt)
> -     return false;
> -      elt = (elt + nelt) & mask;
> -      if (d->perm[i * 2 + 1] != elt)
> -     return false;
> -    }
>  
>    /* Success!  */
>    if (d->testing_p)
> @@ -13440,23 +13406,14 @@ aarch64_evpc_zip (struct expand_vec_perm
>  static bool
>  aarch64_evpc_ext (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>  {
> -  unsigned int i, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int nelt = d->perm.length ();
>    rtx offset;
>  
>    unsigned int location = d->perm[0]; /* Always < nelt.  */
>  
>    /* Check if the extracted indices are increasing by one.  */
> -  for (i = 1; i < nelt; i++)
> -    {
> -      unsigned int required = location + i;
> -      if (d->one_vector_p)
> -        {
> -          /* We'll pass the same vector in twice, so allow indices to wrap.  
> */
> -       required &= (nelt - 1);
> -     }
> -      if (d->perm[i] != required)
> -        return false;
> -    }
> +  if (!d->perm.series_p (0, 1, location, 1))
> +    return false;
>  
>    /* Success! */
>    if (d->testing_p)
> @@ -13488,7 +13445,7 @@ aarch64_evpc_ext (struct expand_vec_perm
>  static bool
>  aarch64_evpc_rev (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>  {
> -  unsigned int i, j, diff, size, unspec, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int i, diff, size, unspec;
>  
>    if (!d->one_vector_p)
>      return false;
> @@ -13504,18 +13461,10 @@ aarch64_evpc_rev (struct expand_vec_perm
>    else
>      return false;
>  
> -  for (i = 0; i < nelt ; i += diff + 1)
> -    for (j = 0; j <= diff; j += 1)
> -      {
> -     /* This is guaranteed to be true as the value of diff
> -        is 7, 3, 1 and we should have enough elements in the
> -        queue to generate this.  Getting a vector mask with a
> -        value of diff other than these values implies that
> -        something is wrong by the time we get here.  */
> -     gcc_assert (i + j < nelt);
> -     if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
> -       return false;
> -      }
> +  unsigned int step = diff + 1;
> +  for (i = 0; i < step; ++i)
> +    if (!d->perm.series_p (i, step, diff - i, step))
> +      return false;
>  
>    /* Success! */
>    if (d->testing_p)
> @@ -13532,15 +13481,17 @@ aarch64_evpc_dup (struct expand_vec_perm
>    rtx out = d->target;
>    rtx in0;
>    machine_mode vmode = d->vmode;
> -  unsigned int i, elt, nelt = d->perm.length ();
> +  unsigned int elt;
>    rtx lane;
>  
> +  if (d->perm.encoding ().encoded_nelts () != 1)
> +    return false;
> +
> +  /* Success! */
> +  if (d->testing_p)
> +    return true;
> +
>    elt = d->perm[0];
> -  for (i = 1; i < nelt; i++)
> -    {
> -      if (elt != d->perm[i])
> -     return false;
> -    }
>  
>    /* The generic preparation in aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1
>       swaps the operand order and the permute indices if it finds
> @@ -13628,61 +13579,37 @@ aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machin
>                                 rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel)
>  {
>    struct expand_vec_perm_d d;
> -  unsigned int i, which;
>  
> -  d.vmode = vmode;
> -  d.target = target;
> -  d.op0 = op0;
> -  d.op1 = op1;
> -  d.testing_p = !target;
> -
> -  /* Calculate whether all elements are in one vector.  */
> -  unsigned int nelt = sel.length ();
> -  for (i = which = 0; i < nelt; ++i)
> +  /* Check whether the mask can be applied to a single vector.  */
> +  if (op0 && rtx_equal_p (op0, op1))
> +    d.one_vector_p = true;
> +  else if (sel.all_from_input_p (0))
>      {
> -      unsigned int ei = sel[i] & (2 * nelt - 1);
> -      which |= (ei < nelt ? 1 : 2);
> +      d.one_vector_p = true;
> +      op1 = op0;
>      }
> -
> -  switch (which)
> +  else if (sel.all_from_input_p (1))
>      {
> -    default:
> -      gcc_unreachable ();
> -
> -    case 3:
> -      d.one_vector_p = false;
> -      if (d.testing_p || !rtx_equal_p (op0, op1))
> -     break;
> -
> -      /* The elements of PERM do not suggest that only the first operand
> -      is used, but both operands are identical.  Allow easier matching
> -      of the permutation by folding the permutation into the single
> -      input vector.  */
> -      /* Fall Through.  */
> -    case 2:
> -      d.op0 = op1;
> -      d.one_vector_p = true;
> -      break;
> -
> -    case 1:
> -      d.op1 = op0;
>        d.one_vector_p = true;
> -      break;
> +      op0 = op1;
>      }
> +  else
> +    d.one_vector_p = false;
>  
> -  d.perm.new_vector (sel.encoding (), d.one_vector_p ? 1 : 2, nelt);
> +  d.perm.new_vector (sel.encoding (), d.one_vector_p ? 1 : 2,
> +                  sel.nelts_per_input ());
> +  d.vmode = vmode;
> +  d.target = target;
> +  d.op0 = op0;
> +  d.op1 = op1;
> +  d.testing_p = !target;
>  
>    if (!d.testing_p)
>      return aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (&d);
>  
> -  d.target = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 1);
> -  d.op1 = d.op0 = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 2);
> -  if (!d.one_vector_p)
> -    d.op1 = gen_raw_REG (d.vmode, LAST_VIRTUAL_REGISTER + 3);
> -
> -  start_sequence ();
> +  rtx_insn *last = get_last_insn ();
>    bool ret = aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (&d);
> -  end_sequence ();
> +  gcc_assert (last == get_last_insn ());
>  
>    return ret;
>  }

Reply via email to