On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> On 10/17/2011 12:26 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
> > wrote:
> > > FWIW, I still believe that tweaking the documentation to match the long
> > > standing reality, would be a small improvement. I'm not going to further
> > > insist, anyway.
> > It isn't improvement.
> > The improvement would be to restore the documented default.
> Well either my English is even weaker than I thought, or "restoring" doesn't
> apply here: the line of code at  issue, pp_set_line_maximum_length (pp, 0),
> has been added by Gaby in Rev 70777, and nothing similar with 72 as second
> argument existed before.

Thus clearly the documentation is wrong ;)  So, I'll approve the patch
for the release branches (where we don't want to change the default).
We can bikeshed a bit more for trunk.

Richard.

Reply via email to