On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis > <g...@integrable-solutions.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >>> FWIW, I still believe that tweaking the documentation to match the long >>> standing reality, would be a small improvement. I'm not going to further >>> insist, anyway. >> >> It isn't improvement. >> The improvement would be to restore the documented default. > > I disagree. Well, both would be an improvement. Restoring the documented > default would be a move in the wrong direction though. Why have different > defaults for different languages anyway?
That is a question for the other front-ends which are not obliged to pick just about anything implemented for g++. > How long has the "new" default be in effect? > > Richard. >
