On 11/22/2017 10:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:27:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>>> The following patch fixes those two issues and adds similar overflow >>>> check to record_store too (in that spot width is always non-negative, so >>>> we don't need a special width == -1 handling). >>>> >>>> Bootstrapped successfully on i686-linux, ok for trunk if it passes regtest >>>> there (and pending x86_64-linux bootstrap + regtest)? >>> >>> Now successfully bootstrapped/regtested on both. >> >> Ok. > > I've reverted the patch on the branch. This isn't stuff we should > backport IMHO. > > Richard. > >> Richard.
Thank you all for fixing that. I'm sorry for that. Martin
