On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:27:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > The following patch fixes those two issues and adds similar overflow
>> > check to record_store too (in that spot width is always non-negative, so
>> > we don't need a special width == -1 handling).
>> >
>> > Bootstrapped successfully on i686-linux, ok for trunk if it passes regtest
>> > there (and pending x86_64-linux bootstrap + regtest)?
>>
>> Now successfully bootstrapped/regtested on both.
>
> Ok.

I've reverted the patch on the branch.  This isn't stuff we should
backport IMHO.

Richard.

> Richard.

Reply via email to