Hi Jakub,
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 02:31:07PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> > Here it is everything in patch form, in case some volunteers are willing
>>> > to
>>> > test it on their targets, because we need faster turn-arounds for this.
>>>
>>> thanks for that: it's easy to loose track in this maze ;-)
>>
>> True. What I'm regtesting (bootstraps already done) on
>> {x86_64,i686,powerpc64{,le}}-linux now is:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00811.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00808.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42861
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42866
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00794.html
>> set. Does pr69102.c FAIL with that set?
>
> thanks for the list. A sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap with the whole
> set is now running; expect results in about two hours.
completed now and the testsuite regression is gone, too.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
