On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:45:51AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:28:22AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > Formatting, this should be
> > >   bool can_move_early_debug_stmts
> > >     = ...
> > > and the line is too long, so needs to be wrapped.
> > > 
> > > Furthermore, I must say I don't understand why
> > > can_move_early_debug_stmts should care whether there are any labels in
> > > dest bb or not.  That sounds very risky for introducing non-# DEBUG 
> > > BEGIN_STMT
> > > debug insns before labels if it could happen.  Though, if
> > > gsi_stmt (gsi) == gsi_stmt (gsie), then the loop right below it will not
> > > do anything and nothing cares about can_move_early_debug_stmts afterwards.
> > > So, in short, can_move_early_debug_stmts is used only if
> > > gsi_stmt (gsi) != gsi_stmt (gsie), and therefore
> > > can_move_early_debug_stmts if it is used is can_move_debug_stmts && (1 || 
> > > ...);
> > > 
> > > So, can we get rid of can_move_early_debug_stmts altogether and just use
> > > can_move_debug_stmts in there instead?
> > > 
> > > Another thing I find risky is that you compute gsie_to so early and don't
> > > update it.  If you don't need it above for can_move_early_debug_stmts, can
> > > you just do it back where it used to be done,
> > 
> > Here it is everything in patch form, in case some volunteers are willing to
> > test it on their targets, because we need faster turn-arounds for this.
> > 
> > 2017-12-13  Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com>
> >         Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> > 
> >     PR bootstrap/83396
> >     PR debug/83391
> >     * tree-cfgcleanup.c (remove_forwarder_block): Keep after
> >     labels debug stmts that can only appear after labels.
> > 
> >     * gcc.dg/torture/pr83396.c: New test.
> >     * g++.dg/torture/pr83391.C: New test.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and powerpc64le-linux,
> powerpc64-linux regtest still pending, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Richard.

> > --- gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c.jj        2017-12-12 09:48:26.813393301 +0100
> > +++ gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c   2017-12-13 11:39:03.373065381 +0100
> > @@ -536,9 +536,14 @@ remove_forwarder_block (basic_block bb)
> >       defined labels and labels with an EH landing pad number to the
> >       new block, so that the redirection of the abnormal edges works,
> >       jump targets end up in a sane place and debug information for
> > -     labels is retained.  */
> > +     labels is retained.
> > +
> > +     While at that, move any debug stmts that appear before or in between
> > +     labels, but not those that can only appear after labels.  */
> >    gsi_to = gsi_start_bb (dest);
> > -  for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); )
> > +  gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb);
> > +  gimple_stmt_iterator gsie = gsi_after_labels (bb);
> > +  while (gsi_stmt (gsi) != gsi_stmt (gsie))
> >      {
> >        tree decl;
> >        label = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> > @@ -557,6 +562,21 @@ remove_forwarder_block (basic_block bb)
> >     gsi_next (&gsi);
> >      }
> >  
> > +  /* Move debug statements if the destination has a single predecessor.  */
> > +  if (can_move_debug_stmts && !gsi_end_p (gsi))
> > +    {
> > +      gcc_assert (gsi_stmt (gsi) == gsi_stmt (gsie));
> > +      gimple_stmt_iterator gsie_to = gsi_after_labels (dest);
> > +      do
> > +   {
> > +     gimple *debug = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> > +     gcc_assert (is_gimple_debug (debug));
> > +     gsi_remove (&gsi, false);
> > +     gsi_insert_before (&gsie_to, debug, GSI_SAME_STMT);
> > +   }
> > +      while (!gsi_end_p (gsi));
> > +    }
> > +
> >    bitmap_set_bit (cfgcleanup_altered_bbs, dest->index);
> >  
> >    /* Update the dominators.  */
> > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr83391.C.jj
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr83391.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > +// PR debug/83391
> > +// { dg-do compile }
> > +// { dg-options "-g" }
> > +// { dg-additional-options "-mbranch-cost=1" { target { i?86-*-* 
> > x86_64-*-* mips*-*-* s390*-*-* avr*-*-* } } }
> > +
> > +unsigned char a;
> > +enum E { F, G, H } b;
> > +int c, d;
> > +
> > +void
> > +foo ()
> > +{
> > +  int e;
> > +  bool f;
> > +  E g = b;
> > +  while (1)
> > +    {
> > +      unsigned char h = a ? d : 0;
> > +      switch (g)
> > +   {
> > +   case 0:
> > +     f = h <= 'Z' || h >= 'a' && h <= 'z';
> > +     break;
> > +   case 1:
> > +     {
> > +       unsigned char i = h;
> > +       e = 0;
> > +     }
> > +     if (e || h)
> > +       g = H;
> > +     /* FALLTHRU */
> > +   default:
> > +     c = 0;
> > +   }
> > +    }
> > +}
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr83396.c.jj
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr83396.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> > +/* PR bootstrap/83396 */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-g" } */
> > +
> > +int fn1 (void);
> > +void fn2 (void *, const char *);
> > +void fn3 (void);
> > +
> > +void
> > +fn4 (long long x)
> > +{
> > +  fn3 ();
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +fn5 (long long x)
> > +{
> > +  if (x)
> > +    fn3();
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +fn6 (long long x)
> > +{
> > +  switch (fn1 ())
> > +    {
> > +    case 0:
> > +      fn5 (x);
> > +    case 2:
> > +      fn2 (0, "");
> > +      break;
> > +    case 1:
> > +    case 3:
> > +      fn4(x);
> > +    case 5:
> > +      fn2 (0, "");
> > +    }
> > +}
> > 
> > 
> >     Jakub
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to