On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 03:00:24PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 09/14/2017 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Ok with those changes
>
> Hi,
>
> this PR has been fixed on trunk (
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=252873 ).
>
> We cannot count this PR as a 6/7 regression, because this test-case has been
> failing since fopenmp was introduced in 4.2. Still, I think it makes sense
> to backport because this is a correctness fix.
>
> OK to backport to 6/7 branch?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
