On 09/14/2017 12:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok with those changes
Hi,this PR has been fixed on trunk ( https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=252873 ).
We cannot count this PR as a 6/7 regression, because this test-case has been failing since fopenmp was introduced in 4.2. Still, I think it makes sense to backport because this is a correctness fix.
OK to backport to 6/7 branch? Thanks, - Tom
