On 11/30/2017 09:55 AM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > >> I don't know what rldicl means without looking it up on the Internet ;) > > :) (zero_extendsidi2/1 it seems, from Seghers dump, not that I would have > known without) Exactly :-) THe names often make it a hell of a lot easier for someone not familiar with a particular architecture to make out what a particular insn does.
> >> Given how frequently I have to look at these dumps, I could get used to >> any encoding though. I don't find them too verbose for my purposes, but >> if saving space is a goal here then I won't object to keeping them as >> single characters > > I personally like the new format much more than what we have (also because > of the more sensible alignment, not having the variable-length pattern > name first). Likewise. I think we should go with the patch as-is. Jeff
