Hi, On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > This improves the assembler output (for -dp and -fverbose-asm) in > > several ways. It always prints the insn_cost. It does not print > > "[length = NN]" but "[c=NN l=NN]", to save space. It does not add one > > to the instruction alternative number (everything else starts counting > > those at 0, too). And finally, it tries to keep things lined up in > > columns a bit better. > > > > Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}; is this okay for trunk? > > FWIW printing the cost would be hepful to me at the -dp level. I agree > with Martin that 'c' and 'l' are too short but using 'len' for length > would be acceptable. Seriously? You'd have a problem to decipher c/l but not rldicl ? Ciao, Michael.