> I'm not intimately familiar with the Glibc ifunc infrastructure > to suggest a good solution here, so assuming this works my only > idea is to suppress the warning for these builds. > > Joseph, do you have a better suggestion? > > Martin
Now that I know building GCC with '--enable-gnu-indirect-function' lets me build GLIBC with IFUNCs maybe it is time for GLIBC to require this instead of just recommending it. Though I guess that is a discussion to take over to the libc-alpha mailing list. >From glibc configure.ac: if test x"$libc_cv_gcc_indirect_function" != xyes && test x"$multi_arch" = xyes; then AC_MSG_WARN([--enable-multi-arch support recommends a gcc with gnu- indirect-function support. Please use a gcc which supports it by default or configure gcc with -- enable-gnu-indirect-function]) fi Steve Ellcey sell...@cavium.com
