On 6 October 2011 19:28, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote: >> > + i = 1; >> > + if ((rhs_code == COND_EXPR || rhs_code == VEC_COND_EXPR) >> >> I don't understand why we need VEC_COND_EXPR here. > > Only for completeness, as VEC_COND_EXPR is the same weirdo thingie like > COND_EXPR. I can leave that out if you want.
But we mark stmts that we want to vectorize here. I think that expecting a vector stmt is confusing. So yes, please, leave it out. Thanks, Ira > > Jakub >
