Re: [PATCH] Optimize COND_EXPR where then/else operands are INTEGER_CSTs of different size than the comparison operands

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> > +             i = 1;
> > +             if ((rhs_code == COND_EXPR || rhs_code == VEC_COND_EXPR)
> 
> I don't understand why we need VEC_COND_EXPR here.

Only for completeness, as VEC_COND_EXPR is the same weirdo thingie like
COND_EXPR.  I can leave that out if you want.

        Jakub