On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > > The more limited interfaces could, of course, be __typeof_noqual in some > > form. > > Actually, despite what I've been arguing, I agree. I've come > to realize that what makes me uneasy about it is its name: it > makes it sound like a special purpose flavor of __typeof__, > when it really is a general purpose __remove_qualifiers trait. > How does renaming it to something like that sound?
__typeof__ makes clear that it returns a type, whether given a type or an expression. Can __remove_qualifiers be applied to an expression, and, if so, what does it do - return a type, or return the result of converting the expression to the corresponding type with whatever qualifiers removed? -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
