I don't know if that wouldn't be overkill. Qualifiers on rvalues are
meaningless in C and that's why my __typeof_noqual strips them all.
We'd then need even e.g. __remove_restrict, not sure if there's need for
these. Maybe it is.
Unless __typeof__ (p) q = p; declares a restrict-qualified q when
p is a restrict-qualified pointer I don't think __remove_restrict
is needed.
On second thought, I agree that if __remove_const and _volatile
were provided then __remove_restrict should also be, if only for
completeness.
Martin
