On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 6/29/17 8:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Peter Bergner wrote: > >> Should we offer an early out of group_case_labels_stmt() for the > >> fairly common case of new_size == old_size? There's no reason to > >> execute the compress labels loop if we didn't combine any of the > >> labels. > > > > We can also merge both loops, counting new_size upwards, storing > > to label new_size if new_size != i ... > > Yeah. I can implement that if you like...unless you want to... > or already have. :-)
Go ahead! Richard.
