On 6/29/17 8:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Peter Bergner wrote: >> Should we offer an early out of group_case_labels_stmt() for the >> fairly common case of new_size == old_size? There's no reason to >> execute the compress labels loop if we didn't combine any of the >> labels. > > We can also merge both loops, counting new_size upwards, storing > to label new_size if new_size != i ...
Yeah. I can implement that if you like...unless you want to... or already have. :-) Peter
