On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.san...@pobox.com> wrote: > On 05/13/2017 11:52 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.san...@pobox.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Ping? I have posted revisions of the following in patch set: >>> >>> 05/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01442.html >>> 09/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00348.html >>> 11/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00350.html >>> >>> I have retested them on Linux x86-64 in addition a Wine testsuite >>> comparison >>> resulting in fewer failed tests (31) than when using unpatched 7.1.0 (78) >>> and 5.4.0 (78). A cursory examination of the now working failures with >>> 7.1.0 seemed to be to be due to race conditions in Wine that are >>> incidentally hidden after the patches. >>> >>> Is there anything else needed before we can commit these? They still >>> rebase >>> cleanly onto the HEAD, but I can repost as "v5" if you prefer. >> >> Please go ahead and commit the patches. >> >> However, please stay around to fix possible fallout. As said - you are >> touching quite complex part of the compiler ... >> >> Thanks, >> Uros. > > > Thanks! I'll definitely be around, I have a lot more that I'm working on > with C generics/pseudo-templates (all middle-end stuff). I also want to > examine more ways that SSE saves/restores can be omitted in these ms to sysv > calls through static analysis and such. > > Anyway, I don't yet have SVN write access, will you sponsor my request?
The patchset was committed to mainline SVN as r248029. Uros.
