On 04/28/2017 01:49 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 04/28/2017 05:26 AM, marxin wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Following patch series improves the infrastructure, fixes couple of issues >> and hopefully improves also documentation of the functionality. >> I decided to split the changes into various patches to make it easier >> for reviewers. > > thanks for doing this. I think I've reviewed all of them, but they turned up > in my inbox this morning with funky dates from the past few days.
Hi. I thank you for very fast review. Yep, you replied all of them. It's caused by fact that commiter date != author date in git. Next time, I'll be more patient and eventually run rebase that will modify that ([1]). I'm planning to include the simple ones (not requesting infrastructure changes) to backport. What's your opinion about doc changes, should I include that as well? [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1579643/change-timestamps-while-rebasing-git-branch/7352870#7352870 Martin > > nathan >
