ENOPATCH. Trying again... Hi,
As discussed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644, the test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c does not apply to POWER targets, as the cost model properly shows the pre-increment approach to be preferable and results in ideal code generation. Thus, adding powerpc*-*-* to the list of targets to skip for this test. Verified on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Is this ok for trunk? Thanks, Bill 2017-02-22 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR tree-optimization/68644 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c: Skip for powerpc*-*-*. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c (revision 245653) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ivopts" } */ -/* { dg-skip-if "PR68644" { hppa*-*-* } { "*" } { "" } } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "PR68644" { hppa*-*-* powerpc*-*-* } { "*" } { "" } } */ void f1 (int *p, unsigned int i)
