On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:54:44PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2017.02.08 at 12:05 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:17:48PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 07/02/17 15:04 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks much for the review. Looks ok now?
> > >
> > > I'd suggest adding something to say that the reason these are now
> > > being diagnosed is that G++ used to treat e.g. this->member, where
> > > member has a non-dependent type, as type-dependent, and now it
> > > doesn't.
> >
> > Like this?
> >
> > Index: porting_to.html
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/porting_to.html,v
> > retrieving revision 1.5
> > diff -u -r1.5 porting_to.html
> > --- porting_to.html 7 Feb 2017 14:22:39 -0000 1.5
> > +++ porting_to.html 8 Feb 2017 11:05:22 -0000
> > @@ -52,7 +52,9 @@
> >
> > <p>
> > As a consequence, the following examples are invalid and G++ will no longer
> > -compile them:
> > +compile them, because, in the following examples, G++ used to treat
>
> Please drop the redundant ", in the following examples".
Why? I don't mean in generally, I only mean in in the context of those
examples.
Marek
