On 11/01/17 17:22, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, James Cowgill wrote: > >>> From this consideration I gather you have a program source which can be >>> used as a test case to reproduce the issue, so can you please file a >>> problem report and include the source and a recipe to reproduce it? Is >>> this a GCC issue with generated assembly or a GAS issue with interpreting >>> it? >> >> Yes I had a testcase which I used to debug this, but it was pretty huge >> (and written in ADA). When debugging I just diffed it with the debug >> information toggled to see if the patch fixed it. I'll see if I can find >> it anyway. > > A test case being huge is not an issue, we can always try to reduce it if > needed. What is key is reproducibility. Please make sure it's > self-contained, i.e. doesn't depend on system-installed components (for > C/C++ I'd ask for a preprocessed source, but I'm not sure offhand what the > requirements are for ADA -- it's been a while since I did anything about > ADA, and even then not a huge lot -- just a GCC 3.4 MIPS port).
Filed as PR/79071 James
