On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, James Cowgill wrote: > > From this consideration I gather you have a program source which can be > > used as a test case to reproduce the issue, so can you please file a > > problem report and include the source and a recipe to reproduce it? Is > > this a GCC issue with generated assembly or a GAS issue with interpreting > > it? > > Yes I had a testcase which I used to debug this, but it was pretty huge > (and written in ADA). When debugging I just diffed it with the debug > information toggled to see if the patch fixed it. I'll see if I can find > it anyway.
A test case being huge is not an issue, we can always try to reduce it if needed. What is key is reproducibility. Please make sure it's self-contained, i.e. doesn't depend on system-installed components (for C/C++ I'd ask for a preprocessed source, but I'm not sure offhand what the requirements are for ADA -- it's been a while since I did anything about ADA, and even then not a huge lot -- just a GCC 3.4 MIPS port). > The issue was about the assembly GCC generated. A GCC bug then. Maciej
