On 2016/11/30 10:47 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > On 11/18/2016 03:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 08:51:00AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote: >>> On 11/11/2016 02:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:46:46PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> >>> And here's the patch. >> >> The patch doesn't look like OpenACC tile clause fortran support, >> but bind/nohost clause C/C++ support. > > I think I got that patch mixed up with the acc routines patch. Here is > the fortran tile clause patch. > > One notable difference between the trunk and gomp4 implementation of the > tile clause is that gomp4 errors on negative value tile arguments, > whereas trunk issues warnings. Is there a reason why the fortran FE > generally emits a warning, on say num_threads(-5), instead of an error? > > Chung-Lin, I noticed in your source tree that you included a change to > gfortranspec.c. Is that necessary for trunk? I've included in this patch > just in case the other tile patches require it. > > Cesar >
About the gfortranspec.c change, that's just a testing artifact, not part of the Fortran FE patch. Chung-Lin
