On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Results w/o patch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-11/msg00627.html > > Results with patch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-11/msg00672.html
Thanks, Andreas, quite useful. For reference, the reason I did not go ahead with the patch right away, but did some more testing are those non-deterministic (at least on FreeBSD) tests we've got: In your testing, the patch "changed" the following: -FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/nested_cilk_for.c -O2 -std=c99 execution test +FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/fib.c -g execution test -FAIL: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test The first two I've never seen, 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc actually went the other direction (from PASS to FAIL) in my original tests. So, at least on FreeBSD 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc pretty much is useful and pretty much random. Gerald
