On 09/13/2011 04:27 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: > This patch touches a bunch of files, but most of the changes are fairly > mechanical. What this does is change the infrastructure of how machine > independent builtin functions are handled. At this point, there is no change > to the compiler from a user perspective. Instead of having two parallel > arrays > that have tree pointers for built-in functions: > > built_in_decls > implicit_built_in_decls > > I have replaced these by two macros that call inline functions: > > BUILT_IN_DECLS > IMPLICIT_BUILT_IN_DECLS > > and changed the other parts that want to modify the builtins. By changing it > to a functional approach instead of an array, we can more easily change the > code underneath.
Why bother with the case change and poisoning? Merely changing the type of the symbol from object to function ought to be sufficient to catch all users at compile time. I say this because I'm not keen on functions using all-caps names... r~
