Hi Mike, > On 18 Nov 2016, at 17:16, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Nov 18, 2016, at 4:33 AM, Iain Sandoe <iain_san...@mentor.com> wrote: >> >> As discussed on IRC, I was under the impression that it is desired to move >> away from #ifdef towards if() and I have been adding those where locally >> things have been touched - in this case it was only partially possible. >> >> However, FAOD - you pointed out that for the RS6000 back-end #ifdef are >> still preferred, > > Shudder. We can encourage anyone that likes #if, to like if () instead. > >> OK now for trunk? > > Ok; I'm pretty sure that change can only impact darwin. If you wanted to > reduce the test case to 3 cases, I think that would also show the problem > that show that your patch fixes it, ok with such a change, if you want.
I’d like to do that; is there a way to force a jump table for a limited set of cases? (the example was about the smallest I could get where GCC elected to produce a jump table instead of branches) Iain > >> Open branches? > > I'm fine with back porting. >
