On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> On 7 November 2016 at 09:01, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > The following fixes an oversight when computing alignment in the
> > vectorizer.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > 2016-11-07 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
> >
> > PR tree-optimization/78189
> > * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_compute_data_ref_alignment): Fix
> > alignment computation.
> >
> > * g++.dg/torture/pr78189.C: New testcase.
> >
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr78189.C
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr78189.C (revision 0)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr78189.C (working copy)
> > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > +/* { dg-do run } */
> > +/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-slp-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model" } */
> > +
> > +#include <cstddef>
> > +
> > +struct A
> > +{
> > + void * a;
> > + void * b;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct alignas(16) B
> > +{
> > + void * pad;
> > + void * misaligned;
> > + void * pad2;
> > +
> > + A a;
> > +
> > + void Null();
> > +};
> > +
> > +void B::Null()
> > +{
> > + a.a = nullptr;
> > + a.b = nullptr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
> > +NullB(void * misalignedPtr)
> > +{
> > + B* b = reinterpret_cast<B*>(reinterpret_cast<char *>(misalignedPtr) -
> > offsetof(B, misaligned));
> > + b->Null();
> > +}
> > +
> > +int main()
> > +{
> > + B b;
> > + NullB(&b.misaligned);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
> > index 9346cfe..b03cb1e 100644
> > --- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
> > +++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
> > @@ -773,10 +773,25 @@ vect_compute_data_ref_alignment (struct
> > data_reference *dr)
> > base = ref;
> > while (handled_component_p (base))
> > base = TREE_OPERAND (base, 0);
> > + unsigned int base_alignment;
> > + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT base_bitpos;
> > + get_object_alignment_1 (base, &base_alignment, &base_bitpos);
> > + /* As data-ref analysis strips the MEM_REF down to its base operand
> > + to form DR_BASE_ADDRESS and adds the offset to DR_INIT we have to
> > + adjust things to make base_alignment valid as the alignment of
> > + DR_BASE_ADDRESS. */
> > if (TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF)
> > - base = build2 (MEM_REF, TREE_TYPE (base), base_addr,
> > - build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (base, 1)), 0));
> > - unsigned int base_alignment = get_object_alignment (base);
> > + {
> > + base_bitpos -= mem_ref_offset (base).to_short_addr () *
> > BITS_PER_UNIT;
> > + base_bitpos &= (base_alignment - 1);
> > + }
> > + if (base_bitpos != 0)
> > + base_alignment = base_bitpos & -base_bitpos;
> > + /* Also look at the alignment of the base address DR analysis
> > + computed. */
> > + unsigned int base_addr_alignment = get_pointer_alignment (base_addr);
> > + if (base_addr_alignment > base_alignment)
> > + base_alignment = base_addr_alignment;
> >
> > if (base_alignment >= TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (vectype)))
> > DR_VECT_AUX (dr)->base_element_aligned = true;
>
> Since you committed this patch (r241892), I'm seeing execution failures:
> gcc.dg/vect/pr40074.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects execution test
> gcc.dg/vect/pr40074.c execution test
> on armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-mode=arm --with-cpu=cortex-a9
> --with-fpu=neon-fp16
> (using qemu as simulator)
The difference is that we now vectorize the testcase with versioning
for alignment (but it should never execute the vectorized variant).
I need arm peoples help to understand what is wrong.
At least the testcase shows there is (kind-of) a missed optimization
that we no longer figure out versioning for alignment is useless.
I'll look into that.
Richard.
