> > It also upsets our careful use of an extension library to provide current > > GCC facilities to Darwin 8...11 (which relies on the two-level namespace > > to use both the system and GCC versions of libgcc_s) ... and, in > > particular, this can cause subtle and difficult to diagnose differences > > of behavior between darwin 9 and later systems. > > > So is the following OK for trunk? > > I'm ok with it from a darwin perspective if you want to go that direction, > though, this would be an Ada person call in the end.
We're reviewing this patch and its consequences. For now the patch is NOT OK since the change was done for a reason initially. The question is whether the reason still holds today, so stay tuned. Arno
