On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > It also upsets our careful use of an extension library to provide current GCC > facilities to Darwin 8...11 (which relies on the two-level namespace to use > both the system and GCC versions of libgcc_s) ... and, in particular, this > can cause subtle and difficult to diagnose differences of behavior between > darwin 9 and later systems.
> So is the following OK for trunk? I'm ok with it from a darwin perspective if you want to go that direction, though, this would be an Ada person call in the end.
