Hi,
This is a patch set adding various match.pd patterns in order to generate 
simplified MIN/MAX_EXPR mostly from COND_EXPR.  This is the first one 
optimizing (convert1 (minmax ((convert2 (x) c)))) to minmax (x c), if convert2 
promotes x and convert1 demotes back to x's type.  With this patch, generated 
assembly for test:
.L4:
        ldr     q0, [x3, x1]
        add     w2, w2, 1
        cmp     w0, w2
        ushll   v2.4s, v0.4h, 0
        ushll2  v1.4s, v0.8h, 0
        umin    v2.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s
        umin    v1.4s, v1.4s, v3.4s
        xtn     v4.4h, v2.4s
        xtn2    v4.8h, v1.4s
        str     q4, [x3, x1]
        add     x1, x1, 16
        bhi     .L4

can be improved to:
.L4:
        ldr     q0, [x3, x1]
        add     w2, w2, 1
        cmp     w0, w2
        umin    v1.8h, v0.8h, v2.8h
        str     q1, [x3, x1]
        add     x1, x1, 16
        bhi     .L4

Bootstrap and test on x86_64 and AArch64 for whole patch set.  Is it OK?

Thanks,
bin

2016-10-21  Bin Cheng  <bin.ch...@arm.com>

        * match.pd ((convert1 (minmax ((convert2 (x) c)))) -> minmax (x c)):
        New pattern.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-10-21  Bin Cheng  <bin.ch...@arm.com>

        * gcc.dg/fold-convmaxconv-1.c: New test.
        * gcc.dg/fold-convminconv-1.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index b782a1e..7365bc1 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -1331,6 +1331,28 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
        && TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type)
        && operand_equal_p (@1, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type), OEP_ONLY_CONST))
    @0)))
+
+#if GIMPLE
+/* (convert1 (minmax ((convert2 (x) c)))) -> minmax (x c) if convert2
+   promotes x and convert1 demotes back to x's type.  */
+
+(for minmax (min max)
+ (simplify
+  (convert (minmax@0 (convert @1) INTEGER_CST@2))
+  (if (types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE (@1), type))
+   (with
+    {
+      tree minmax_type = TREE_TYPE (@0);
+      signop sgn = TYPE_SIGN (type);
+      widest_int type_min = widest_int::from (wi::min_value (type), sgn);
+      widest_int type_max = widest_int::from (wi::max_value (type), sgn);
+    }
+    (if (sgn == TYPE_SIGN (minmax_type)
+        && TYPE_PRECISION (minmax_type) >= TYPE_PRECISION (type)
+        && wi::to_widest (@2) >= type_min && wi::to_widest (@2) <= type_max)
+     (minmax @1 { fold_convert (type, @2); }))))))
+#endif
+
 (for minmax (FMIN FMAX)
  /* If either argument is NaN, return the other one.  Avoid the
     transformation if we get (and honor) a signalling NaN.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convmaxconv-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convmaxconv-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3ffff8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convmaxconv-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+int foo (short a[], int x)
+{
+  unsigned int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+    {
+      x = a[i];
+      a[i] = (x <= 0 ? 0 : x);
+    }
+  return x;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = MAX_EXPR <x_\[0-9\]*" "optimized" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convminconv-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convminconv-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f4a048e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-convminconv-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+int foo (unsigned short a[], unsigned int x)
+{
+  unsigned int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+    {
+      x = a[i];
+      a[i] = (x >= 255 ? 255 : x);
+    }
+  return x;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = MIN_EXPR <x_\[0-9\]*" "optimized" } } */

Reply via email to