On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> This breaks building with gcc-4.3.
>>
>> g++ -std=gnu++98 -fno-PIE -c  -DUSE_LIBUNWIND_EXCEPTIONS  -g -DIN_GCC     
>> -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall 
>> -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wmissing-format-attribute 
>> -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros 
>> -Wno-overlength-strings  -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. 
>> -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/../include 
>> -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include  -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber 
>> -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber 
>> -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace   -o insn-emit.o -MT insn-emit.o -MMD -MP -MF 
>> ./.deps/insn-emit.TPo insn-emit.c
>> cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-implicit-fallthrough"
>> make[3]: *** [insn-emit.o] Error 1
>
> Guess it must have been some mistake against the policy that unknown -Wno-*
> options aren't complained about, unless something else is diagnosed.
>
> Anyway, Marek, can you add configure check for that?

Existing practice is to instead use -Wno-error rather than warning
flags that were not present in those early GCC versions.

Richard.

>         Jakub

Reply via email to