On 1 September 2016 at 12:25, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/16 17:34, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> > On 30 August 2016 at 20:24, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote:
>> > > On 26/08/16 13:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > The following patch adds option -Wrestrict that warns when an argument
>> > > > is passed to a restrict qualified parameter and it aliases with
>> > > > another argument.
>> > > >
>> > > > eg:
>> > > > int foo (const char *__restrict buf, const char *__restrict fmt, ...);
>> > > >
>> > > > void f(void)
>> > > > {
>> > > > char buf[100] = "hello";
>> > > > foo (buf, "%s-%s", buf, "world");
>> > > > }
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does -Wrestrict generate a warning for this example?
>> > >
>> > > ...
>> > > void h(int n, int * restrict p, int * restrict q, int * restrict r)
>> > > {
>> > > int i;
>> > > for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> > > p[i] = q[i] + r[i];
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > h (100, a, b, b)
>> > > ...
>> > >
>> > > [ Note that this is valid C, and does not violate the restrict
>> > > definition.
>> > > ]
>> > >
>> > > If -Wrestrict indeed generates a warning, then we should be explicit in
>> > > the
>> > > documentation that while the warning triggers on this type of example,
>> > > the
>> > > code is correct.
>> > I am afraid it would warn for the above case. The patch just checks if
>> > the parameter is qualified
>> > with restrict, and if the corresponding argument has aliases in the
>> > call (by calling operand_equal_p).
>>
>> > Is such code common in practice ?
>>
>> [ The example is from the definition of restrict in the c99 standard. ]
>>
>> According to the definition of restrict, only the restrict on p is required
>> to
>> know that p doesn't alias with q and that p doesn't alias with r.
>>
>> AFAIK the current implementation of gcc already generates optimal code if
>> restrict is only on p. But earlier versions (and possibly other compilers as
>> well?) need the restrict on q and r as well.
>>
>> So I expect this code to occur.
>>
>> > If it is, I wonder if we should keep
>> > the warning in -Wall ?
>> >
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder if we can use the const keyword to silence the warning.
>>
>> So if we generate a warning for:
>> ...
>> void h(int n, int * restrict p, int * restrict q, int * restrict r)
>> {
>> int i;
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> p[i] = q[i] + r[i];
>> }
>> h (100, a, b, b)
>> ...
>>
>> but not for:
>> ...
>> void h(int n, int * restrict p, const int * restrict q, const int * restrict
>> r)
>> {
>> int i;
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> p[i] = q[i] + r[i];
>> }
>> h (100, a, b, b)
>> ...
>>
>> Then there's an easy way to rewrite the example such that the warning doesn't
>> trigger, without having to remove the restrict.
>
> Note that I've seen restrict being used even for
>
> void h(int n, int * restrict p, int * restrict q)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> p[2*i] = p[2*i] + q[2*i + 1];
> }
>
> thus where the actual accesses do not alias (the pointers are used
> to access every other element). I think the definition of "object"
> (based on accessed lvalues) makes this example valid. So we
> shouldn't warn about
>
> h (n, p, p)
>
> but we could warn about
>
> h (n, p, p + 1)
>
> and yes, only one of the pointers need to be restrict qualified.
>
> Note that as with all other alias warnings if you want to avoid
> false positives and rely on conservative analysis then you can
> as well simply avoid taking advantate of the bug in the code
> (as we do for TBAA and trivial must-alias cases). If you allow
> false positives then you ultimatively end up with a mess like
> our existing -Wstrict-aliasing warnings (which are IMHO quite
> useless).
>
> Note that nowhere in GCC we implement anything closely matching
> the formal definition of restrict as writte in the C standard --
> only in fronted code could we properly derive the 'based-on'
> property and note lvalues affected by restrict. Currently we
> are restricted to looking at restrict qualified parameters
> because of this.
Hi,
The attached version passes bootstrap+test on ppc64le-linux-gnu.
Given that it only looks if parameters are restrict qualified and not
how they're used inside the callee,
this can have false positives as in above test-cases.
Should the warning be put in Wextra rather than Wall (I have left it
in Wall in the patch) or only enabled with -Wrestrict ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> Richard.
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
index 3feb910..a3dae34 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "gimplify.h"
#include "substring-locations.h"
#include "spellcheck.h"
+#include "gcc-rich-location.h"
cpp_reader *parse_in; /* Declared in c-pragma.h. */
@@ -13057,4 +13058,76 @@ diagnose_mismatched_attributes (tree olddecl, tree
newdecl)
return warned;
}
+/* Warn if an argument at position param_pos is passed to a
+ restrict-qualified param, and it aliases with another argument. */
+
+void
+warn_for_restrict (unsigned param_pos, vec<tree, va_gc> *args)
+{
+ tree arg = (*args)[param_pos];
+ if (TREE_VISITED (arg) || operand_equal_p (arg, null_pointer_node, 0))
+ return;
+
+ location_t loc = EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (arg, input_location);
+ gcc_rich_location richloc (loc);
+
+ unsigned i;
+ tree current_arg;
+ auto_vec<unsigned> arg_positions;
+
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*args, i, current_arg)
+ {
+ if (i == param_pos)
+ continue;
+
+ tree current_arg = (*args)[i];
+ if (operand_equal_p (arg, current_arg, 0))
+ {
+ TREE_VISITED (current_arg) = 1;
+ arg_positions.safe_push (i);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (arg_positions.is_empty ())
+ return;
+
+ struct obstack fmt_obstack;
+ gcc_obstack_init (&fmt_obstack);
+ char *fmt = (char *) obstack_alloc (&fmt_obstack, 0);
+
+ char num[32];
+ sprintf (num, "%u", param_pos + 1);
+
+ obstack_grow (&fmt_obstack, "passing argument ",
+ strlen ("passing argument "));
+ obstack_grow (&fmt_obstack, num, strlen (num));
+ obstack_grow (&fmt_obstack,
+ " to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument",
+ strlen (" to restrict-qualified parameter "
+ "aliases with argument"));
+
+ /* make argument plural and append space. */
+ if (arg_positions.length () > 1)
+ obstack_1grow (&fmt_obstack, 's');
+ obstack_1grow (&fmt_obstack, ' ');
+
+ unsigned pos;
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (arg_positions, i, pos)
+ {
+ tree arg = (*args)[pos];
+ if (EXPR_HAS_LOCATION (arg))
+ richloc.add_range (EXPR_LOCATION (arg), false);
+
+ sprintf (num, "%u", pos + 1);
+ obstack_grow (&fmt_obstack, num, strlen (num));
+
+ if (i < arg_positions.length () - 1)
+ obstack_grow (&fmt_obstack, ", ", strlen (", "));
+ }
+
+ obstack_1grow (&fmt_obstack, 0);
+ warning_at_rich_loc (&richloc, OPT_Wrestrict, fmt);
+ obstack_free (&fmt_obstack, fmt);
+}
+
#include "gt-c-family-c-common.h"
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.h b/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
index bc22baa..cdb762e 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ extern void c_parse_final_cleanups (void);
extern void warn_for_omitted_condop (location_t, tree);
extern void warn_for_memset (location_t, tree, tree, int);
+extern void warn_for_restrict (unsigned, vec<tree, va_gc> *);
/* These macros provide convenient access to the various _STMT nodes. */
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c.opt b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
index a5358ed..5ec3a25 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c.opt
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c.opt
@@ -1012,6 +1012,11 @@ Wduplicate-decl-specifier
C ObjC Var(warn_duplicate_decl_specifier) Warning LangEnabledBy(C ObjC,Wall)
Warn when a declaration has duplicate const, volatile, restrict or _Atomic
specifier.
+Wrestrict
+C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_restrict) Warning LangEnabledBy(C ObjC C++
ObjC++,Wall)
+Warn when an argument passed to a restrict-qualified parameter aliases with
+another argument.
+
ansi
C ObjC C++ ObjC++
A synonym for -std=c89 (for C) or -std=c++98 (for C++).
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
index fe0c95f..05510f6 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c
@@ -8369,6 +8369,25 @@ c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary (c_parser
*parser,
warn_for_memset (expr_loc, arg0, arg2, literal_zero_mask);
}
+ if (TREE_CODE (expr.value) == FUNCTION_DECL && warn_restrict)
+ {
+ unsigned i;
+ tree arg;
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (exprlist, i, arg)
+ TREE_VISITED (arg) = 0;
+
+ unsigned param_pos = 0;
+ function_args_iterator iter;
+ tree t;
+ FOREACH_FUNCTION_ARGS (TREE_TYPE (expr.value), t, iter)
+ {
+ if (POINTER_TYPE_P (t) && TYPE_RESTRICT (t)
+ && !TYPE_READONLY (TREE_TYPE (t)))
+ warn_for_restrict (param_pos, exprlist);
+ param_pos++;
+ }
+ }
+
start = expr.get_start ();
finish = parser->tokens_buf[0].get_finish ();
expr.value
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 690e928..ab73655 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -6878,6 +6878,26 @@ cp_parser_postfix_expression (cp_parser *parser, bool
address_p, bool cast_p,
warn_for_memset (input_location, arg0, arg2, literal_mask);
}
+ if (TREE_CODE (postfix_expression) == FUNCTION_DECL
+ && warn_restrict)
+ {
+ unsigned i;
+ tree arg;
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (args, i, arg)
+ TREE_VISITED (arg) = 0;
+
+ unsigned param_pos = 0;
+ for (tree decl = DECL_ARGUMENTS (postfix_expression);
+ decl != NULL_TREE;
+ decl = DECL_CHAIN (decl), param_pos++)
+ {
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl);
+ if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type) && TYPE_RESTRICT (type)
+ && !TYPE_READONLY (TREE_TYPE (type)))
+ warn_for_restrict (param_pos, args);
+ }
+ }
+
if (TREE_CODE (postfix_expression) == COMPONENT_REF)
{
tree instance = TREE_OPERAND (postfix_expression, 0);
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 1f04501..869bf07 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
-Wparentheses -Wno-pedantic-ms-format @gol
-Wplacement-new -Wplacement-new=@var{n} @gol
-Wpointer-arith -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast @gol
--Wno-pragmas -Wredundant-decls -Wno-return-local-addr @gol
+-Wno-pragmas -Wredundant-decls -Wrestrict -Wno-return-local-addr @gol
-Wreturn-type -Wsequence-point -Wshadow -Wno-shadow-ivar @gol
-Wshift-overflow -Wshift-overflow=@var{n} @gol
-Wshift-count-negative -Wshift-count-overflow -Wshift-negative-value @gol
@@ -5274,6 +5274,12 @@ compilations.
Warn when deleting a pointer to incomplete type, which may cause
undefined behavior at runtime. This warning is enabled by default.
+@item -Wrestrict
+@opindex Wrestrict
+@opindex Wno-restrict
+Warn when an argument passed to a restrict-qualified parameter
+aliases with another argument
+
@item -Wuseless-cast @r{(C++ and Objective-C++ only)}
@opindex Wuseless-cast
@opindex Wno-useless-cast
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..25e3721
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wrestrict" } */
+
+int foo (char *__restrict buf, const char *__restrict fmt, ...);
+
+void f(void)
+{
+ char buf[100] = "hello";
+ foo (buf, "%s-%s", buf, "world"); /* { dg-warning "passing argument 1 to
restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 3" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-2.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bfcd944
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fdiagnostics-show-caret -Wrestrict" } */
+
+void f(int *__restrict x, int *y, int *__restrict z, int *w);
+
+void foo(int alpha, int beta)
+{
+ f (&alpha, &beta, &alpha, &alpha); /* { dg-warning "passing argument 1 to
restrict-qualified parameter aliases with arguments 3, 4" } */
+
+/* { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ f (&alpha, &beta, &alpha, &alpha);
+ ^~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8cbacab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35503-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wrestrict" } */
+
+void f(int *x, int *__restrict y);
+
+void foo(int a)
+{
+ f (&a, &a); /* { dg-warning "passing argument 2 to restrict-qualified
parameter aliases with argument 1" } */
+}
