Hi, This is a ping. Is the patch ok for trunk?
Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> Thanks for your objections. >> >> HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least <tab> which >> distinguishes it from filename: >> $ pwd >> /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386 >> $ grep "scan-assembler" avx2-* |grep -v "\t" |wc -l >> 0 >> >> Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless file. Updated one is attached. >> >> Thanks, K >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not >>>> pattern name. >>>> >>>> Is it ok? >>>> >>>> Thanks, K >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 >>>>> >>>>> testsuite/ChangeLog entry: >>>>> >>>>> 2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> PR testsuite/50185 >>>>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ... >>>>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this. Update. >>>>> >>>>> Test passes. >>>>> Ok for trunk? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, K >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems. > > Thanks. > > > > -- > H.J. >
