Hi guys, Thanks for your objections. HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least <tab> which distinguishes it from filename: $ pwd /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386 $ grep "scan-assembler" avx2-* |grep -v "\t" |wc -l 0
Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless file. Updated one is attached. Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not >> pattern name. >> >> Is it ok? >> >> Thanks, K >> >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 >>> >>> testsuite/ChangeLog entry: >>> >>> 2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@intel.com> >>> >>> PR testsuite/50185 >>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ... >>> * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this. Update. >>> >>> Test passes. >>> Ok for trunk? >>> >>> Thanks, K >>> >> > > Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems. > > -- > H.J. >
pr50185-3.gcc.patch
Description: Binary data
