On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:57:01PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > This is what I've bootstrapped and regression tested on > powerpc64le-linux. I'm using Peter's testcases from this thread > rather than the one in the original patch submission, because that one > relies on -O0 not reducing the function down to a nop. OK to apply?
This is okay. Does it need a backport? Okay for 6 as well, then. We all agreed the question marks would be a good idea, but you say it causes some testcases to fail. Could you investigate please? Thanks, Segher > PR target/71733 > gcc/ > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Deal > with p9_vector override before power9-dform override. > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/powerpc/p9-novsx.c: New.
